sábado, 19 de agosto de 2017

‘God has a good ear for music’: the Catholic response to Reformation music | August 18, 2017 | MercatorNet |

‘God has a good ear for music’: the Catholic response to Reformation music

August 18, 2017 | MercatorNet  |







‘God has a good ear for music’: the Catholic response to Reformation music

Polyphony was never in real danger from the Council of Trent.
Chiara Bertoglio | Aug 18 2017 | comment 


A portrait of the Council of Trent in session from the Church of Santa Maria in Trastevere, Rome
For centuries, histories of religion in the sixteenth century have been strongly marked by confessional partisanship: either Luther’s Reformation was good and the Council of Trent a bigoted and reactionary (though belated) effort; or Protestantism was a religious catastrophe and Trent the fortress which stood firm against its menacing waves.
Fortunately, in our time, both historiography and theology have adopted more nuanced views, which allow us to see – from virtually any confessional standpoint – both the Protestant Reformations and the Council of Trent as stages of a journey, in which people of good will, on both sides, strove with passion and commitment for the Church and the Gospel.
Indeed, the very term “Counter-Reformation” is becoming inadequate and obsolete, for a number of reasons: first, it has a marked flavour of conflict; second, it characterizes the Catholic self-renewal merely as a reaction to Protestantism; third, it fails to distinguish between those Catholic initiatives which aimed at containing the spread of the Reformations, and those which addressed a need for inner purification, which was voiced by many Catholics at the time.
Obviously, music was not the primary concern of the Council Fathers when, after many years of uncertainty, they finally gathered in the north-Italian city of Trent, just at the borders of the German-speaking zones. There were more pressing issues, including the re-statement or the better definition of some crucial Catholic dogmas, which had been challenged by the Reformers.
Music in the context of eucharistic worship
It was not the Fathers’ aim to create a compendium of all Catholic theology; they discussed and deliberated on the most burning questions. Among them there was, of course, the nature and sacramental value of the Eucharist, which had been variously disputed by the Reformers, who came to adopt very dissimilar views of the Mass; it was within the framework of liturgy, therefore, that music was primarily discussed.
As was customary for church councils, the Fathers established a topic which needed discussion; then (and frequently even before this definition), opinions were gathered from a variety of sources: experiences of clergy or cultivated laity, thoughts of influential people from the academic or civic world, ideas from missionaries and theologians and so on. Several commissions were established, to work in parallel on the topics at stake and to evaluate the opinions which had been collected. These commissions then prepared a draft decree, which was heard and discussed by the plenary assembly. In most cases the Council Fathers would suggest revisions, and the draft was rewritten by the commission, proceeding from commission to assembly for as many times as was needed.
Historians have, therefore, an immense written heritage concerning the Council; however, one should always be very careful to evaluate each document within its own framework: a draft as a draft, a decree as a decree, a discussion as a discussion.
Polyphony was never in danger from the council fathers
This is particularly relevant to musical issues, since, for years, some collateral documents were discussed and considered as final decrees, while the precise purpose of this complex system was in fact to sift the crucial issues on which the Catholic Church was in agreement, from those which remained open to debate. Therefore, a musical “legend” took hold, stating that the Council of Trent was close to banning all polyphonic music from Catholic worship, when – almost miraculously – upon hearing the Missa Papae Marcelli by Palestrina (pictured, left), the Fathers changed their minds.
Beside the fact that the dating of that Mass by Palestrina is still debated, the point is that polyphony was never in serious danger among Catholics. It had been banned, indeed, from the official worship of other Christian confessions; and it was true that more sobriety and restraint were frequently advocated both at the Council and outside it. However, polyphonic music was part of the traditional liturgy, and most churchmen would have been horrified at its abolition.
In fact, this legend makes little sense also from a theological viewpoint. The concerns of many Evangelical reformers were directed toward a better religious education of the laity. Worship, for many of them, started to revolve around the sermon, or sometimes it came to be identified with it. Thus, the musical aspect of Sunday gatherings was subordinated to preaching: music had to become a preaching in sounds. Consequently, it was imperative that words be clearly heard by all the parishioners, and a tight polyphonic writing was very ill-suited for this purpose.
Trent aimed to purify the Catholic tradition in music, not replace it
In contrast, the Catholic view was that the celebration of the Eucharist was directed primarily toward God, as an act of thanksgiving – and it might be supposed that he had a good ear for music. In fact, music had to be as beautiful as possible in order to “adorn” the sacrifice of the Mass and to make it more pleasing to God. What mattered was not that music be clearly intelligible to all, but that it be properly articulated.The difference may seem a minor one – if a text is sung clearly, it will be understood clearly; however, it was crucial for the very concept of worship and of the role of music within it.
The wording of the final decree on music was therefore short, even laconic; in Craig Monson’s translation, it reads: “Let them keep away from the churches compositions in which there is an intermingling of the lascivious or impure, whether by instrument or voice.” In my opinion, this short sentence reveals a deeply-felt concern for the “purity” of God’s people, and particularly of the clergy. In the Catholic field, it was felt that a true reform of the Church had to start with a thorough renewal of the clerical class, to which – lest we forget – most Church singers effectively belonged.
From a “high” concept of the Mass and the Eucharist, the Fathers deduced a “high” concept of the priestly dignity: those who were in closest contact with the sacred mysteries had to be as pure and saintly as possible. Thus, their music had to be as pure and free from secular influences as possible in turn; it had both to mirror the purity of God and to encourage human performers and listeners to get closer to it.
Though the theological starting points were therefore very different from those of the Evangelical Reformers, the result was not so dissimilar: at Trent, as in Wittenberg, or in Strasburg, or in Geneva, music was seen as a formidable resource for embellishing worship, for touching the hearts, and for making human prayer as worthy of the divine as possible.
Dr Chiara Bertoglio is a musician, a musicologist and a theologian writing from Italy. She is particularly interested in the relationships between music and the Christian faith, and has written several books on this subject. Her new book, Reforming Music: Music and the Religious Reformations of the Sixteenth Century, was published earlier this year by De Gruyter. Visit her website.
MercatorNet

August 18, 2017

In the wake of the violence at Charlottesville at the weekend Confederate monuments have been toppled or removed in some American cities and more are slated to follow. White nationalists are going to lose this battle, it seems, but they are probably not the only ones to feel resentment at their local history being consigned to oblivion. There must be many ordinary people who feel sore about it.
Where I live the nearest equivalent would be pulling down the statue of Queen Victoria in Albert Park, since she presided over the colonisation of New Zealand. Although her representative Governor Hobson made a treaty with Maori chiefs, British settlement brought wars with local tribes and confiscations, so that the Crown is now involved in an ongoing process of compensation. Still, the injustices of the colonial era in this country were as nothing compared to the history of slavery in the American South and effort to defend it.
Besides, historical figures like Victoria and Hobson mean nothing to the average Kiwi citizen, and removing their statues would be regarded as, at least, art vandalism and at worst the equivalent of cutting down an ancient tree. It is quite a different story with some Americans, according to one MercatorNet reader. He writes:
Having lived in the South for a short period of time years ago,  I understand the sentiment. There is kind of cultural nostalgia for the old South and its traditions. It is kind of infectious when you are around it -- a consciousness of losing touch with one’s roots and regional character. Not everyone feels that way about the culture, though, because they have a more realistic perspective on the history and its consequences.

Looking at it objectively, what culture celebrates "heroes" of a failed and discredited ideology? Is this not unique? The statues were erected by a defeated people who defended the great indignities and suffering inflicted on the human person that slavery involved, and afterwards developed a system of segregation and discrimination. I understand some of the statues were erected in the 1970s in protest against civil rights.

Sure, many of the civil war heroes did think they were serving the nation and had substantial personal achievements that could be admired, but they cannot and should not be held up as role models for the entire community.

Taking the statues down is not trying to erase history -- history is in books, in schools and in popular media and should be taught and remembered. We need to teach and learn from it.

What happened at Charlottesville is, in a sense, the last battle of defiance of the Civil War. It is about time that the war be declared over and we get rid of the symbols of an ideology about which we should be feeling shame.

The South has changed a lot, demographically and culturally. It is time to rebrand the South to reflect the dynamic place it is today. After the statues are moved to confederate cemeteries or put in museums where they belong, it would be a great opportunity for the community to come together to discuss the figures we do want to honour in our towns and city parks and squares. Heroes who have served the common good.
One is tempted to say, “Good luck with that,” in an America which appears so divided. Yet pessimism is a cop-out. There really is no alternative to “coming together to discuss” what affects the common good, and, as the article below by Christopher Love argues, there is one place we all can -- and should -- be practising how to disagree civilly about contentious issues: in our own extended family. If we can do that -- and not just avoid awkward topics -- it should be easier to have those public discussions about history and monuments, and more important things, without anger, and, least of all, violence.


Carolyn Moynihan 
Deputy Editor, 
MERCATORNET



‘It’s about people like me’: disabled and dead against euthanasia
By Liz Carr
Assisted suicide laws are at their core about disability.
Read the full article
 
Total eclipse, partial failure: Scientific expeditions don’t always go as planned
By Barbara Ryden
Maps, locals, weather have all threatened to foil eclipse hunters.
Read the full article
 
‘God has a good ear for music’: the Catholic response to Reformation music
By Chiara Bertoglio
Polyphony was never in real danger from the Council of Trent.
Read the full article
 
A prenuptial for indissoluble marriages
By Patrick F. Fagan
For couples aiming at ‘forever’.
Read the full article
 
Religion and politics at the dinner table: challenging the old maxim
By Christopher W. Love
Families are uniquely able to foster civil dialogue.
Read the full article
 
European childlessness is on the rise
By Marcus Roberts
But does it mean total fertility rates are dropping?
Read the full article
 
The inspiring life of Ruth Pfau, leprosy doctor
By Carolyn Moynihan
The death of a nun who worked for 50 years in Pakistan closes a life of Christian service.
Read the full article
 
Will Australia crack open the seal of confession?
By Michael Cook
The Royal Commission into child sex abuse wants to break an age-old tradition
Read the full article
 
Back to the future… or the end of the road?
By Michael Kirke
Neo-Marxist ideology has Christianity in its sights.
Read the full article
 
Modern Day Slavery
By Marcus Roberts
More profitable and more widespread than ever.
Read the full article


MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation 
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia 

Designed by elleston

‘God has a good ear for music’: the Catholic response to Reformation music

No hay comentarios: