Written by Kaunain Sheriff M |Edited by Explained Desk |New Delhi |Updated: November 9, 2019 1:59:24 pm
Ayodhya verdict Explained: What is adverse possession, the Muslim claim SC rejected?
The Muslim side had claimed that the mosque was built 400 years ago by Babar – and that even if it is assumed that it was built on the land where a temple earlier existed, Muslims, by virtue of their long exclusive and continuous possession.
The five-judge Constitution Bench that delivered the judgment in the Ayodhya case said that while Muslims never lost possession of the disputed land, they could not assert the right of adverse possession.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario